Survey Report
Half of Cloud Spend Wasted on Unused or Idle Resources
Cloud waste is a significant industry problem, with over $17B spent each year on unused or idle cloud resources. Cloud waste is also a significant contributor to global climate change, with greenhouse gas emissions from data centers being roughly equal to emissions generated by the airline industry.
To learn more about cloud waste perceptions and experiences at the enterprise level, we surveyed 105 IT professionals with knowledge of their organization’s cloud spend. We found that cloud waste is recognized as a significant issue with serious impacts, and it’s a high priority for organizations to address.
Our survey reached a broad range of organizations in terms of cloud spend, with monthly cloud spend ranging from less than $1K for some, and over $1M for others. Common across all of those ranges though is the expectation that cloud spend will increase over the next 12 months, with 32% of respondents saying they expect their organization’s cloud spend to increase by a lot and another 44% expecting it to increase somewhat.
Predictability of monthly cloud spend is not an issue, with 94% saying they know, at least roughly, what their cloud spend will be each month.
Respondents estimated that nearly half of their cloud spend is wasted on unused or idle resources. They also indicated that they feel confident in knowing how much of their cloud spend is wasted, with 35% feeling extremely confident in their estimate and another 49% feeling somewhat confident.
Cloud waste has a significant impact on the organizations we surveyed, with reduced profitability and damage to IT’s reputation being the top two impacts cited. Not surprisingly, respondents say that reducing cloud waste is a priority for their organization, with 33% saying it’s a very high priority and another 43% saying that, while not the highest priority, it is still important.
The two most significant causes of cloud waste according to respondents are cloud complexity, which makes it hard to estimate the resources that are actually needed, and also intentional over-provisioning used as a safety measure to ensure application performance. Kubernetes is a significant contributor to the cloud complexity issue, with 62% agreeing that it is a major or contributing factor.
Given the significant contribution of Kubernetes complexity to the cloud waste issue, we wanted to find out how those decisions are made. In most organizations (55%) IT Ops or Cloud Ops teams are responsible for making those decisions, while dev and engineering teams are responsible in 29% of companies. Only 27% are making resource allocation decisions based on optimization recommendations from machine learning.
If you consider the key results from our survey:
It begs the question – why is cloud waste still a problem?
The answer lies in the causes of cloud waste. It’s primarily a result of cloud and Kubernetes complexity. IT teams have no way of being certain of the number of resources needed to ensure their applications perform well, so they err on the side of heavy over-provisioning.
When deploying an app on Kubernetes, you have to make many decisions on resource allocation including memory requests and limits, CPU requests and limits, and replicas. Add to that app-specific parameter settings like JVM heap size and garbage collection, and multiply by the number of containers, and you quickly have a highly complex, multi-dimensional optimization problem that impacts the cost of running the app, the performance of the app, and its reliability.
This level of complexity is beyond human ability to effectively manage. That’s why most organizations either rely on default settings or they attempt to tune their applications through a process of trial and error, neither of which are effective.
Application optimization solutions like StormForge use machine learning to explore this complex, multi-dimensional parameter space. This process of rapid experimentation can identify the configurations that best balance the trade-offs between performance and cost, resulting in cloud cost savings of 30 to 60 percent for most organizations and performance improvements in the same range.
We surveyed 105 IT professionals across North America who are familiar with their organization’s cloud spend and usage. Key demographics of respondents are shown below.
Start getting resizing recommendations minutes from now.
Watch An Install
Free trial includes full version on 1 cluster for 30 days!
We use cookies to provide you with a better website experience and to analyze the site traffic. Please read our "privacy policy" for more information.